popup

Current Articles | Categories | Search

News Articles

Monday, December 17, 2007
USCIS Revises Filing Instructions for Form I-130 (Immigrant Petition for Alien Relative)
By admin @ 7:45 AM :: 195 Views :: 0 Comments :: News, Family Immigration
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) revised the filing instructions for the Petition for Alien Relative (Form I-130). Effective December 3, 2007, all applicants filing stand-alone Form I-130s are encouraged to file their petitions with the Chicago Lockbox instead of a USCIS Service Center.
 
Petitions filed with the Chicago Lockbox will be routed to, and adjudicated at, the appropriate USCIS Service Center. This routing will be based on the petitioner’s place of residence in the United States.
 
Two separate post office box addresses (see below) have been established that correspond to the appropriate USCIS Service Center (either Vermont or California) that will process and adjudicate the petition. Although Form I-130 will be filed with the Chicago Lockbox, petitioners will receive receipt notices from either the Vermont or California Service Center.
 
Applicants who reside in Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington, Wisconsin or Wyoming are encouraged to file their stand-alone Form I-130s with the Lockbox using the following address:
 
                                                            USCIS
                                                     P.O. Box 804625
                                                 Chicago, IL 60680-1029
 
Applicants who reside in Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, U.S. Virgin Islands, West Virginia or District of Columbia are encouraged to file their stand-alone Form I-130 with the Lockbox using the following address:
 
                                                             USCIS
                                                     P.O. Box 804616
                                                Chicago, IL 60680-1029
 
While the changes are effective December 3, any Form I-130 filed with the Service Center will not be rejected; it will be forwarded to the designated Chicago Lockbox. Applicants are encouraged, however, to begin using the designated Lockbox filing on the effective date in order to avoid processing delays.
 
The revised form and filing instructions will be available through USCIS’ Website at www.uscis.gov as soon as they are available.
Sunday, December 16, 2007
USCIS Revises I-9 Employment Eligibility Form
By admin @ 7:41 AM :: 150 Views :: 0 Comments :: News, Other
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that a revised Employment Eligibility Verification Form (I-9) is now available for use. All employers are required to complete a Form I-9 for each employee hired in the United States.
 
The revision seeks to achieve full compliance with the document reduction requirements of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA), which reduced the number of documents employers may accept from a newly hired employee during the employment eligibility verification process.  
 
Key to the revision is the removal of five documents for proof of both identity and employment eligibility. They include: Certificate of U.S. Citizenship (Form N-560 or N-570); Certificate of Naturalization (Form N-550 or N-570); Alien Registration Receipt Card (Form I-151); the unexpired Reentry Permit (Form I-327); and the unexpired Refugee Travel Document (Form I-571). The forms were removed because they lack sufficient features to help deter counterfeiting, tampering, and fraud.
 
Additionally, the most recent version of the Employment Authorization Document (Form I-766) was added to List A of the List of Acceptable Documents on the revised form. The revised list now includes: a U.S. passport (unexpired or expired); a Permanent Resident Card (Form I-551); an unexpired foreign passport with a temporary I-551 stamp; an unexpired Employment Authorization Document that contains a photograph (Form I-766, I-688, I-688A, or I-688B); and an unexpired foreign passport with an unexpired Arrival-Departure Record (Form I-94) for nonimmigrant aliens authorized to work for a specific employer.
 
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) said that employers must transition to the revised Employment Eligibility Verification Form (I-9) no later than December 26, 2007. All employers are required to complete a Form I-9 for each employee hired in the United States.  The new form should be used for new hires after December 26th or for employees where an I-9 reverification  will take place after that date.
 
On November 7, USCIS announced the availability of the revised version of Form I-9 (includes the revision date – (Rev. 06/05/07)N printed on the lower right corner of the form) which is now the only version valid for use. In that November 7 announcement,USCISexplained that employers would have 30 days, beginning on the date the Federal Register notice is published, to transition to the revised form. Accordingly, effective December 26, 2007, employers who fail to use the revised form will be subject to applicable penalties. 
 
Both the revised form and the “Handbook for Employers, Instructions for Completing the Form I-9" are available online at THIS LINK.  
Friday, December 14, 2007
DOS Releases January Visa Bulletin
By admin @ 12:30 AM :: 158 Views :: 0 Comments :: News, Visa Bulletin
The Department of State (DOS) released its January 2008 Visa Bulletin. Of particular interest is the heavy retrogression taking place for Indian nationals in the Employment-Based Two (EB2) category. In January, EB2 will retrogress even further than Employment-Based Three (EB3) for Indians.  That is the first time we have ever seen that happen! The DOS also states the following in the Visa Bulletin:
 
INDIA EMPLOYMENT SECOND PREFERENCE CUT-OFF DATE RETROGRESSION FOR JANUARY - It has been necessary to once again retrogress the India Employment Second preference cut-off date. This is a direct result of continued heavy applicant demand for numbers by CIS for adjustment of status cases despite the retrogression which occurred for December. It is likely that the annual limit for this category will be reached within the next few months, at which time the category would become “unavailable” for the remainder of fiscal year 2008."
 
If the EB2 category becomes ‘unavailable’ for most of 2008, it would cause quite a bit of hardship for Indian national. Hopefully our government will take action next year and fix this broken system of issuing immigrant visa numbers. To view the entire Visa Bulletin, please go to THIS LINK.
Thursday, December 13, 2007
USCIS Clarifies Validity of Permanent Resident Cards Without Expiration Dates
By admin @ 7:39 AM :: 161 Views :: 0 Comments :: News, Family Immigration, Other
On August 22, 2007, USCIS published a proposed regulation that, when implemented, would require lawful permanent residents to replace permanent resident cards (Form I-551) with no expiration date. This proposed rule in no way affects the current validity of these permanent resident cards. Permanent residents who possess these cards may continue to use them as proof of permanent residency when traveling, when seeking employment, and at any time such proof is required. 

The final rule, once published, will explain the process to replace these ‘green cards’. Persons who hold these permanent resident cards with no expiration date may replace their cards now, but there is currently no requirement to do so. 

We will provide an update when the final rule is published by USCIS.


Thursday, November 01, 2007
DHS Removes I-485 Receipt Notice from H/L Travel Requirements
By admin @ 7:50 AM :: 266 Views :: 0 Comments :: News, I-485 Adjustment of Status, Other

On October 31, 2007, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a final rule that removed the requirement that a person who has an I-485 adjustment of status application pending and travels using H or L status have an I-797 receipt notice for the I-485 adjustment application before leaving the United States.  Under the old rule, the person must have an I-797 receipt notice for the adjustment application before travel to avoid having such application deemed abandoned.  This new rule is a result of excessive delays by the Immigration Service in issuing I-485 receipt notices.  The final rule is effective November 1, 2007.  For more information on this final rule, please do not hesitate to contact our office.

Tuesday, July 24, 2007
USCIS Issues FAQ on 140/485 Filings Pursuant To July Visa Bulletin No. 107
By admin @ 12:30 PM :: 1817 Views :: 0 Comments :: News, Visa Bulletin, I-140 Petitions, I-485 Adjustment of Status

The United States Citizenship and Immigration Service issued a Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) memo yesterday that addressed a number of questions people have regarding filing I-140 and I-485 applications pursuant to the July Visa Bulletin No. 107.  Since the FAQ is helpful and informative, we have listed each question and answer below.

Q1: Will USCIS reject a concurrently filed EB I-140/I-485 case if it is lacking a required Labor Certification?
 

A1: USCIS will not accept an I-140 based on a required labor certification application if the approved labor certification application is not submitted in connection with the filing. USCIS will not accept a concurrently filed Form I-485 if the required Form I-140 is rejected for lack of an approved labor certification application.
 
Q2: Will USCIS reject an application for missing or incorrect filing fees?
 
A2: Yes, in accordance with standard procedure and applicable regulations, USCIS will reject any filings submitted with incorrect filing fees.
 
Q3: Will USCIS reject an application for a missing signature?
 
A3: Yes, in accordance with standard procedure and applicable regulations, USCIS will reject any filings that do not contain required signatures.
 
Q4: Will a concurrently filed I-140/I-485 be rejected if filed with an incorrect I-140 or I-485 fee?
 
A4: USCIS will reject any filings submitted with the incorrect filing fees.
 
Q5: Where should employment-based adjustment applications be filed?
 
A5: Forms I-485 may be filed at either the Nebraska Service Center or the Texas Service Center in accordance with the Direct Filing Update issued June 21, 2007.
 
Q6: What happens if an application is filed at the wrong Service Center?
 
A6: Forms I-485 should be filed at either the Texas or Nebraska Service Centers. However, through August 17, 2007 only, employment-based adjustment applications filed at the California and Vermont Service Centers will not be rejected and will be relocated to the appropriate Service Center. Filing at the wrong location could result in processing delays.
 
Q7: Which fees apply to I-765 and I-131 applications associated with AOS applications filed on or after July 30th under the July Bulletin?
 
A7: The fee of $180 for Forms I-765 and the fee of $170 for Form I-131 will remain in effect for those aliens eligible to file an employment-based adjustment of status application pursuant to July Visa Bulletin No. 107. These fees will remain in effect for all such applications filed between July 17 - August 17, 2007.
 
Q8: What is the correct fee for concurrently filed I-140s filed between July 30 and August 17?
 
A8: The new fee applies to Forms I-140, whether or not concurrently filed with an employment-based adjustment application, that are filed on or after July 30, 2007. That fee is $475.
 
Q9: Will customers eligible to file adjustment applications under July Visa Bulletin No. 107 have the option to pay the NEW filing fees in connection with adjustment applications filed on or after July 30, 2007 and on or before August 17, 2007?
 
A9: No, customers will not have the option of paying the new filing fees for adjustment applications. USCIS has determined that aliens in employment-based categories filing applications pursuant to July Visa Bulletin No. 107 should be subject to the pre-July 30, 2007 fees as that fee schedule would have applied had aliens been allowed to file throughout the month of July.
 
Q10: Will USCIS accept employment-based adjustment of status applications under July Visa Bulletin No. 107 if the priority date is August 1, 2007 or later?
 
A10: No.
 
Q11: Will USCIS accept adjustment applications under July Visa Bulletin No. 107 if the priority date is before July 31, 2007, but the certification is granted after August 1, 2007?
 
A11: Yes, USCIS will accept such cases provided they are submitted by August 17, 2007.
 
Q12: Will USCIS accept concurrently filed I-140s/I-485s filed after July 31 when a labor certification is not required (i.e. priority date is established on or after August 1)?
 
A12: USCIS will accept properly filed Forms I-140 filed on behalf of aliens with a priority date on or after August 1, 2007; however, pursuant to August Visa Bulletin No. 109, USCIS will reject any concurrently filed adjustment of status applications filed by aliens with a priority on or after August 1, 2007.
 
Q13: Can applications be filed without a required medical examination report?
 
A13: Yes. Consistent with its current regulations and practice, USCIS will accept adjustment of applications filed pursuant to Visa Bulletin No. 107 without a completed medical examination. In such cases, USCIS will issue a request for evidence.
 
Q14: The July 17, 2007 USCIS press release stated that USCIS would accept applications filed not later than August 17, 2007. Does this mean applications delivered on August 17, 2007 will be accepted but those arriving August 18, 2007 will be rejected?
 
A14: Yes
 
Q15: How long will aliens have to wait for their employment-based applications to be adjudicated?
 
A15: Applicants should monitor the State Department’s visa bulletin to determine whether a visa number is available based upon their individual priority dates. There are annual statutory limitations, thus some aliens may have to wait a significant period of time, perhaps years, before visa numbers become available.
 
Applications for interim benefits (employment authorization and advance parole) will be processed prior to final adjudication of the adjustment application and in accordance with USCIS standard procedures.
 
Q16: When will premium processing of Forms I-140 be reinstated?
 
A16: Premium processing of Forms I-140 has been suspended until further notice. USCIS will publish any updates on the availability of premium processing for Forms I-140 on its website.
 
Q17: How will USCIS interpret the language of AC21 Sec 104(c) (for three-year H-1B extensions) during a period in which AOS applications could be filed?
 
A17: USCIS interprets AC21 §104(c) as only applicable when an alien, who is the beneficiary of an approved I-140 petition, is eligible to be granted lawful permanent resident status but for application of the per country limitations. Any petitioner seeking an H-1B extension on behalf of a beneficiary pursuant to AC21 §104(c) must thus establish that at the time of filing for such extension, the alien is not eligible to be granted lawful permanent resident status on account of the per country immigrant visa limitations.
 
Q18: Will there be any delays in processing applications received as a result of the July 17 notice reopening the filing period for employment-based adjustment applications under the July Visa Bulletin?
 
A18: Depending on the volume of applications received, there may be some delay in the issuance of receipt notices. Processing times will be update don the USCIS web site.
 
Q19: What procedures should be followed when filing an I-485 application based on a pending I-140, when the petitioner has not received a copy of the I-140 receipt notice?
 
A19: Applicants filing a Form I-485 that does not contain a copy of an I-797 receipt notice for a previously filed Form I-140 are advised to put a brightly colored sheet of paper on top of the filing with the following notice and information:
 
TO THE MAILROOM: The enclosed I-485 Adjustment Application(s) should be matched with a pending I-140 Immigrant Petition for which no Receipt Notice has been received. The Immigrant Petition (type e.g., I-140) was delivered to (Service Center) on (provide date of filing and tracking number): Petitioner’s name; Beneficiary’s name; Beneficiary’s date of birth; Beneficiary’s country of birth.
Our firm will continue to provide updates as they become available.
Wednesday, July 18, 2007
USCIS Announces Revised Processing Procedures for I-485 Applications
By admin @ 5:19 AM :: 532 Views :: 0 Comments :: News, Visa Bulletin, I-485 Adjustment of Status
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that, beginning immediately, it will accept employment-based applications to adjust status (Form I-485) filed by aliens whose priority dates are current under the July Visa Bulletin, No. 107. USCIS will accept applications filed not later than August 17, 2007.
 
This is a fantastic victory for those who campaigned against the Department of State’s (DOS) revised July Visa Bulletin (No. 108) dated July 2, 2007. This Visa Bulletin has been withdrawn by the DOS and the original July Visa Bulletin that shows all employment-based categories (except Other Workers) as ‘current’ should be relied upon as the correct July Visa Bulletin.
 
USCIS’s announcement allows anyone who was eligible to apply under the original July Visa Bulletin a full month’s time to do so. Applications that are already properly filed with USCIS will also be accepted. The current fee schedule will apply to all applications filed under the original July Visa Bulletin (No. 107) through August 17, 2007. The new fee schedule that becomes effective on July 30, 2007 will apply to all other applications filed on or after July 30, 2007.
 
Stay tuned to www.bashyamspiro.com for updates.
Sunday, July 15, 2007
USCIS Issues Clarification on Reciept Date on Labor Certification Substitutions
By admin @ 7:31 AM :: 421 Views :: 0 Comments :: News, Labor Certification (PERM), I-140 Petitions

USCIS announced that it will accept labor certification substitution requests in the context of Form I-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker, filings it receives on Monday, July 16, 2007.  USCIS previously announced that it would reject all labor certification substitution requests filed on or after July 16, 2007.  The new DOL regulation that prohibits substitutions of an alien beneficiary on any application for permanent labor certification will go in effect July 17, 2007 and not July 16, 2007.

Sunday, July 15, 2007
Senator Lofgren Requests Written Response To Questions from Chertoff
By admin @ 7:19 AM :: 436 Views :: 0 Comments :: News, Visa Bulletin
Representative Zoe Lofgren (D-San Jose) sent a letter to Secretary of Homeland Security Chertoff requesting "all correspondence, e-mails, memoranda, notes, field guidance or other documentation relating to the issuance" of the "Update to July Visa Availability" on July 2, 2007. The letter contains thirteen separate questions and requests for information relevant to the issuance of the updated Visa Bulletin.

"The Department's unprecedented decision to reject adjustment of status applications has caused needless hardship and disruption to countless immigrants," noted Rep. Zoe Lofgren. "It has also come to my attention that USCIS began returning visa numbers to the State Department as early as Thursday, July 5, 2007, due to their inability to review applications effectively. The Department of Homeland Security has once again demonstrated its inability to complete even its core missions. This debacle demonstrates the need for more transparency and oversight of the department's operations and procedures."

The full text of the letter is included below:

July 11, 2007

The Honorable Michael Chertoff
Secretary
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Washington, DC 20528

Dear Secretary Chertoff:

On July 2, 2007, the Department of State (DOS) issued an "Update to July Visa Availability," which the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) apparently relied on to suspend its acceptance of adjustment of status applications based on employment-based immigrant petitions. DOS and DHS acted on these matters despite my request that the agencies provide the Subcommittee with certain information before taking such actions.

At no point since my letter to you dated July 2, 2007, have I received any information in writing from the Department. Given this failure, I am now requesting that you provide to me, within three days of the date of this letter, the following information:

1. All correspondence, e-mails, memoranda, notes, field guidance or other documentation relating to the issuance of or the Department of Homeland Security's actions regarding the July Visa Bulletin, which made all employment-based immigrant visa categories (except the "other worker" category) current. The term "Department of Homeland Security" includes DHS or any component thereof.

2. All e-mails, correspondence, memoranda, notes, field guidance or other documentation relating to the issuance of or the Department of Homeland Security's actions regarding the "Update to July Visa Availability" issued on July 2, 2007. The term "Department of Homeland Security" includes DHS or any component thereof.

3. All correspondence, e-mails, memoranda, notes, field guidance or other documentation between the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of State, the Department of Justice and/or the Federal Bureau of Investigation relating to the availability of visa numbers for the month of July 2007, the issuance of or the Department of Homeland Security's actions regarding the "Update to July Visa Availability" issued on July 2, 2007, the processing of security or name checks in connection with visa number requests through the end of FY 2007, and/or the determination to suspend or reject the acceptance of adjustment of status applications. The terms "Department of Homeland Security," "Department of State," "Department of Justice" and "Federal Bureau of Investigation" include DHS, DOS, DOJ, FBI or any components of those agencies.

4. A detailed description of any existing or proposed understanding, arrangement and/or agreement between DHS (or any component thereof, including, but not limited to, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services) and the FBI (or any component thereof) relating to name checks or other security checks conducted with respect to immigration applications or petitions.

5. A detailed description of how DHS and/or the FBI expect the processes for such name or security checks to change through the end of FY 2007, and, in particular, within the month of July 2007.

6. A detailed description, including, but not limited to, a statistical tallying, of all employment-based immigration cases, petitions, applications or other files for which DHS (or any component thereof, including, but not limited to USCIS) requested a visa number between May 2007 and July 2, 2007, inclusive, for which any name or security check was pending, uncompleted or otherwise awaiting action on a security or name check. (Hereinafter, such cases will be referred to as cases for which visa numbers were "pre-requested.")

7. The specific legal authority on which DHS (or any component thereof, including, but not limited to, USCIS) relied to "pre-request" visa numbers for cases, applications, petitions or other files for which security or name checks were pending, uncompleted or otherwise awaiting action. The response to this question shall include copies of the specific legal authority, including statutory provisions, regulations, field manuals, policy memoranda, policy guidance or other documentation relied upon, as well as the date or dates on which such authority was last revised or issued, the substance of any revision and the original text that was revised.

8. Any and all correspondence, e-mails, memoranda, field guidance, notes or other documentation discussing or referencing the agency's decision to "pre-request" visa numbers for which security or name checks were pending, uncompleted or otherwise awaiting action.

9. Any and all field guidance, e-mails, correspondence, memoranda, notes or other documentation discussing or referencing the agency's plans, policies or other proposed or expected actions in the event security or name checks for cases, applications, petitions or other files for which the agency "pre-requested" visa numbers are not or do not get completed during July 2007 or the remainder of FY 2007, including, but not limited to, whether the agency has proposed or intends to return, or has discussed returning, visa numbers for such cases to DOS.

10. Any and all correspondence, e-mails, memoranda, notes or other documentation between DHS (including any component thereof, including, but not limited to, USCIS) and DOS regarding the availability of visa numbers for June 2007, July 2007, or any remaining month of FY 2007, including, but not limited to, the anticipated numbers available during such months, the expected or anticipated usage of or requests for such numbers and/or the update, revision, restatement or alteration of the July Visa Bulletin.

11. Any and all records or other documentation (with a summary for ease of analysis) regarding historic patterns of overtime ordered for work on weekends, including specifically the weekend leading up to July 2, 2007, and the reasons in each case that prompted the overtime, for the past three years.

12. Any and all records or other documentation (with a summary for ease of analysis) regarding historic patterns of adjudication of adjustment of status cases, including a breakout for adjustment of status cases based on employment-based immigrant petitions, on a monthly basis for the past three years.

13. Any and all records, analyses, spreadsheets, related e-mails, memoranda, correspondence or other documentation evaluating the potential financial effects to DHS (or any component thereof, including, but not limited to USCIS) if adjustment of status cases eligible for filing under the initial July 2007 Visa Bulletin were filed before, on or after July 30, 2007.

Thank you for your immediate consideration of this very important matter.

Sincerely,

Zoe Lofgren
Chairwoman
Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship,
Refugees, Border Security & International Law
Wednesday, July 04, 2007
Representative Lofgren Issues Statement on Updated Visa Bulletin
By admin @ 8:36 AM :: 385 Views :: 0 Comments :: News, Visa Bulletin

Representative Zoe Lofgren sent letters to both Secretary Michael Chertoff and Secretary Condi Rice in connection with the updated July Visa Bulletin.  To read her statement that explains to both how revising the Visa Bulletin is contrary to law, please go to THIS LINK.

Hopefully we will see other members of Congress step up and put pressure on the State Department on this very serious and important issue.

Previous Page | Next Page